The Copilot vs Cursor vs Panto Comparison Ends Here
If you're searching for the best AI code review tool, you're likely considering GitHub Copilot, Cursor AI, CodeRabbit, Greptile or even building an internal solution.




Where They Stop, We Start

30,000+ SAST Checks
Comprehensive security analysis that goes beyond basic linting

Business Context Integration
Dynamic integration with Jira, Confluence for context-aware reviews

Team Visibility Layer
Engineering managers get insights into review bottlenecks and code quality
A Side-by-Side Feature Grid
See how Panto stacks up against the competition across all the features that matter for code review.

Not Just a Tool, A Visibility Layer for the Whole Org
- Panto gives engineering managers visibility into what's slowing reviews, who's overloaded, and what code smells are repeatedly making it to QA.
- "Catch a typo" is not code review; Panto checks for business logic mismatches, infra config risks, security secrets, and regression-prone changes — things IDEs can't see.
- We help teams, not just individual devs. We review like your best engineer; Context-aware, ruthless about shipping clean code.
An Open Source Framework for Data Driven Comparison
We’ve built an open-source framework that lets you run your own repositories through our tool and compare the results against competitors. Test it yourself, see the differences, and draw conclusions from real data—not assumptions.
For reference, we’ve also run this framework on a curated set of open-source repositories and published the results here. Stop relying on gut feel—let the numbers speak.
Your AI Code Review Agent
Wall of Defense | Aligning business context with code | Never let bad code reach production
No Credit Card
No Strings Attached
